How
to shove an elephant through a thread of copper or fiber-optic
light that is the dilemma facing the managers of
Siam Cement these days. In truth the elephant is only a
corporate logo, but the reality of marrying the Internet
with a traditional building products company in a battered,
backward economy is barely less difficult than the image.
Thailand's third-largest company, No. 397 in this year's
Asiaweek 1000 with revenues of $2.9 billion in 1999 and
a $124.2 million loss, is in desperate need of a makeover.
Its managers know it. Its employees know it. And most of
all, the foreign and domestic investors who have hammered
the company's stock down almost 60% in the last year
while the key Bangkok index declined almost 40% know
it. So if there's so much agreement about what should be
done, why has restructuring at Siam Cement nearly ground
to a halt?
First of all, the company is constrained by its primary
marketplace, Thailand. It's one thing to complain that Siam
Cement is overbroad with more than 100 subsidiaries and
tens of thousands of products. But it is another to understand
that its core building-products business, the one it is
supposed to be focusing on, is selling to a construction
industry that remains flat on its back in Thailand and pretty
dismal throughout Asia. And for critics who want to see
the company modernized, that is easier said than done. Siam
Cement has a defined e-commerce strategy, but it doesn't
do much good to be far ahead in building an interactive
B2B portal if your customers don't have the equipment or
inclination to do business that way in the first place.
But hold the tears: Siam Cement remains one of Thailand's
largest and best-connected companies the Royal Family
owns more than one-third of it. While it has done an admirable
job of reducing its dollar-denominated debt from more than
$4 billion to less than $1 billion in the last three years,
its restructuring seems to have slowed to a crawl. The company
has sold about $80 million in non-core assets in the last
18 months; an estimated $909 million remains. "They've been
slow in bringing off [the sell-off]," says Jeff Earhart,
analyst with DBS Thai Danu Securities in Bangkok. "They're
waiting for the right buyer at the right price everybody
says that."
Company president Chumpol NaLamlieng says Siam has not backed
off its commitment to change. "I am restructuring to get
rid of assets that don't fit," he says. "I am not getting
rid of a problem. We need buyers." So Chumpol isn't desperate
to sell. That may be good, but Siam's remaining shareholders
probably think that the company should be a little more
aggressive about getting rid of the "non-problems." Forcing
an elephant through a wire is one thing, but forcing an
elephant to go anywhere it doesn't want to is a whole different
problem.
By Julian Gearing/Bangkok